After years of maintaining its sprawling digital “empire,” Google now finds itself in a weakened position, grappling with a significant two-pronged legal assault that has the potential to fundamentally reshape its core businesses and, as the US Department of Justice contends, create new avenues for its competitors.
Read: Vivo X200 Pro Review: Tantalising telephoto
The past year has delivered a series of legal blows to the tech giant. A federal judge previously ruled Google an illegal monopolist in the critical internet search market, and just last week, another judicial decision concluded that the company had also unlawfully monopolized the ad technology sector.
Now, a new and crucial phase commences in the first of these battles: a three-week trial in Washington, D.C., aimed at determining appropriate remedies to restore competition within the online search arena.
While Google has reportedly vowed to appeal both adverse rulings, it cannot formally do so until the full appeals process has been exhausted in each case. This leaves the Department of Justice with the immediate opportunity to argue for significant structural remedies, including potential forced divestitures and other operational restrictions, according to reports in foreign media such as The Telegraph.
In the courtroom starting Monday, April 21, 2025, the government will present its arguments for compelling Google to divest its widely used Chrome web browser, mandate the sharing of valuable search data with rival companies, require the company to keep the government informed of all new artificial intelligence investments, and dismantle its existing exclusivity agreements with browser and smartphone manufacturers.
The Department of Justice firmly believes that such substantial measures are necessary to effectively dismantle Google’s entrenched monopoly in the search market.
A key argument centres on Google’s exclusive agreements with Apple, which the government contends create an insurmountable barrier for high-quality competitors seeking to gain traction. Similarly, the ownership of Chrome provides Google with undue control over a primary gateway through which users access search engines. Furthermore, the sheer dominance of Google search grants the company access to vast quantities of user query data, a crucial resource that its competitors simply cannot match.
Beyond addressing the current situation, the Department of Justice reportedly aims to ensure that any legal remedies imposed by the court are robust enough to withstand future market evolutions, preventing Google from reasserting monopoly power down the line. This future-proofing is a significant reason for the inclusion of AI in the discussions, as there are concerns that this rapidly developing field could become another dominant research platform controlled by Google.
While the government previously withdrew its request for Google to sell its existing AI investments following the change in presidential administration, it still seeks a requirement for the company to proactively notify the government of all future investments in this critical area.
The court proceedings will involve testimony from key Google executives involved in its Search, Android, and Chrome businesses, as well as executives from competing internet search providers such as DuckDuckGo, Microsoft’s Bing, and Yahoo, providing a comprehensive view of the competitive landscape and the potential impact of the proposed remedies.
